Friday, March 7, 2008

The Closing Bell

The Closing Bell

3/8/08

Statistical Summary

Current Economic Forecast

2007

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product: 2.0- 2.5%

Inflation: 2 - 2.5 %

Growth in Corporate Profits: 6-8%

2008 (revised)

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 0-1.5%

Inflation: 1.75-2%

Growth in Corporate Profits: 3-5%

Current Market Forecast

Dow Jones Industrial Average

2008

Current Trend:

Short Term Trading Range 11600-12511

Medium Term Trading Range 11600-14203

Long Term Trading Range 7100-14203

Year End Fair Value: 14050

2009 Year End Fair Value: 14471-14893

Standard & Poor’s 500

2008

Current Trend:

Medium Term Uptrend 1269-1722

Medium Term Trading Range 1062-1527

Long Term Trading Range 750-1527

Year End Fair Value: 1615

2009 Year End Fair Value: 1663-1711

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio 17%

High Yield Portfolio 22%

Aggressive Growth Portfolio 20%

Economics

The economy is a neutral for Your Money. There was lots of economic data reported this week, most of it mixed but with one devastating number--a very soft February non farm payroll report. This was the second decline in as many months. As you know, one of my favorite observations over the last year has been that we can’t have a recession when everyone has a job (income)--well, we now know that January’s payroll number wasn’t an aberration and that my favorite observation carries a lot less weight, suggesting that the economy is weaker than my current forecast. As a result, I am lowering (again) my expectations for 2008 real economic growth to 0-1.5% versus the current 1-2% projection. This reflects a slowdown in the first half of 2008 with a feeble recovery in the second half.

For the moment, I am leaving the inflation estimate unchanged though as you know I am growing increasingly concerned that it may be too low; I am also not revising my 2008 corporate profit number. Given the current excellent state of company balance sheets, including the lack of excess inventory, as well as strong global demand, I think that my forecast is still reasonable.

This week’s data points included: no real meaningful information on housing; only one bit of macro economic news which was the release of the Fed’s latest Beige Book showing a slowing economy but rising price pressures; consumer statistics that included a mixed picture of retail sales but also the aforementioned disappointing jobs report; industrial activity figures that were largely down, though in most cases better than forecasts.

Bottom line: the economy will ‘muddle through’ though at a very slow rate which could dip modestly into negative territory. Unfortunately I am also growing more worried about rising inflationary pressures (note the poor unit labor cost number as well as the commentary in the Beige Book) and the declining dollar. As a result, the Fed will almost certainly be forced to tighten monetary policy quickly once the liquidity crisis has passed and that suggests a weak recovery.

(1) the only housing related stat was weekly mortgage applications [secondary indicator] which rose 3%--the first increase in several weeks,

(2) all the consumer related data, save the retail sales numbers, focused on employment: [a] weekly jobless claims fell 22,000 versus expectations of a 8,000 decline, [b] on the other hand, February non farm payrolls dropped 63,000 versus expectations of being down 5,000; in addition, January non farm payrolls were revised from down 17,000 to a decrease of 22,000, [c] the unemployment rate at the end of February came in at 4.8% versus expectations of 5.0% and January’s reported 4.9%--but don’t get too excited; experts attributed the decline to a rising number of people dropping out of the labor pool, [d] finally, the International Council of Shopping Centers {ICSC} reported weekly sales of major retailers fell .6% while rising 2.1% on a year over year basis; Redbook Research reported month to date retail chain store sales declined 1.3% versus the comparable period in January while they increased a paltry .5% over the similar timeframe in 2007; the ICSC also reported that February retail sales {+1.9%} came in better than expected {0.5-1.0%},

(3) industry data contained both good news and bad news: [a] January construction spending fell 1.7%, in line with expectations, [b] the February Institute for Supply Management’s {ISM} manufacturing index came in at 48.7 {anything below 50.0 signifies contraction} though it was better than estimates of 48.0, [c] while the February ISM non manufacturing index was reported at 49.3 versus expectations of 47.2 and January’s 44.6 reading, [d] fourth quarter productivity was up 1.9% versus estimates of up 1.8%, [e] fourth quarter unit labor costs rose by 2.6% versus forecasts of an increase of 2.1% {remember in January, they fell 1.9%}, and [f] January factory orders declined 2.5% versus expectations of down 2.2%,

(4) only a single macro economic data point: the Fed released its latest Beige Book which basically said most geographic regions of the country and most economic sectors were experiencing weakness but price pressures were starting to increase.

The Economic Risks:

(1) the economy is weaker than expected.

(2) Fed policy (reading the data correctly).

(3) a disruption in global oil supplies (It is not the price of oil but its availability that will cause severe economic dislocation.).

(4) protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.).

(5) fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.).

(6) a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.)

Politics

Both the domestic and international political environments are a negative for Your Money.

The Market

Technical

The DJIA (11893) is in a short term trading range defined by 11622 /11900 (the January intra day low/the January low close) and 12722 (the November 2007 intra day low). With the S&P (1293) I am watching the boundaries of the up trend off the 1982 low (circa 1282-1735), the 750-1527 2002-present trading range and the short term trading range comparable to the DJIA range (1269-1406).

I was hoping for an emotional sell off of Friday; and while stock prices were down (the DJIA closed ever so slightly below its January low close), there just wasn’t the kind of panic that exists when the Market bottoms (or tests a bottom). That likely means more agony early next week. Given that I believe that the Market is attempting to bottom, if we get an emotional flush, I will probably put a little money to work.

Fundamental

The DJIA (11893) finished this week about 11.5% below Fair Value (13449) while the S&P closed (1293) around 16.5% undervalued (1548).

Equity values were challenged this week by not only enhanced fears of recession (most specifically the February jobs report) but by concerns of the lack of liquidity in the financial system (the on again, off again Ambac re-cap; the margin calls at Thornburg and Carlyle). Given investor response to economic reports, it seems like the near term risks of recession have for the most part been discounted; it is the health of the banking institutions that appears to be causing investor heart burn. That said even though we got a daily dose of bad news on the credit markets, there was also news of financial institutions, corporations and the government taking action to address the crisis issues--not the least of which was the Fed’s announcement on Friday that it was increasing its credit facility to (liquidity impaired) banks. The $32,000 question is, are these measures sufficient enough to allow our financial system to manage and innovate its way out of the current very difficult situation or does it collapse on itself? with the $64,000 question being how much of either scenario is currently in price of stocks?

I, of course, have no clue. My back stop to this ignorance is our Price Disciplines, which will protect our Portfolios from large losses while keeping them in a position to benefit when, as and if investors realize the worse case is not going to happen.

Our investment strategy is to:

(a) use any price declines to buy positions in great quality companies whose stocks have either remained within their Valuation Range or have briefly traded below it but quickly rebounded (but keeping a minimum cash position of 15%),

(b) insure that my research on the Valuation Model especially for those stocks that have broken below or are near their Stop Loss Price is up to date and the Values generated by the Model reflect the current economic reality,

(c) build our Buy Lists, drawing largely from stocks on our Watch Lists as we review their financials and gain confidence in their Value Range [see (a) and (b) above],

(d) use positive days in the Market to Sell stocks that have traded into that ‘no man’s land’ between the lower boundary of their Buy Value Range and the Stop Loss Price but have been unable to recover into their Buy Value Range,

(e) be mindful that the Market may very well not have bottomed; so our Stop Loss Discipline and a large cash position [see Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios above] remain critical,

(e) on a longer term basis, recognize that there are both technical and fundamental factors that argue for caution and therefore to proceed carefully with our Buying, keeping a larger than normal cash position in anticipation of valuation and strategy changes that could result from a potentially new domestic economic agenda.

DJIA S&P

Current 2008 Year End Fair Value 14050 1615

Fair Value as of 3/31//08 13449 1548

Close this week 11893 1293

Over Valuation vs. 3/31 Close

5% overvalued 14121 1625

10% overvalued 14794 1703

Under Valuation vs. 3/31 Close

5% undervalued 12777 1471

10%undervalued 12104 1393

15%undervalued 11431 1316

20%undervalued 10759 1238

The Portfolios and Buy Lists are up to date.

Company Highlight:

Pfizer is a major producer of pharmaceuticals, hospital products and animal health lines. The company has earned a 20%+ return on equity and grown profits and dividends at a 14%+ rate for the last 10 years. PFE is facing patent expiration of over one half of its drug sales by 2011; because of that the stock has experienced lack luster performance over the past year and at current price yields over 5.5%. Nevertheless, PFE has a huge drug research program, is currently building it biotech business and will likely make acquisitions--all of which should mitigate its drug expiration problem. In addition, the company is likely to continue to grow its dividend at a 5%+ annual rate which when coupled with its current yield provides a competitive total rate of return. PFE is rated A

++ by Value Line and has only about 10% of its capitalization as debt.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PFE

Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 38 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder. Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns, managing a risk arbitrage hedge fund and an investment banking boutique specializing in funding second stage private companies. Through his involvement with Strategic Stock Investments, Steve hopes that his experience can help other investors build their wealth while avoiding tough lessons that he learned the hard way.

3/7/08

Economics

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.). Is this too good to be true?:

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000002682132

**************************

So much for investors’ lessening worries over credit market problems. Yesterday there was news of margin calls and bankruptcy among hedge funds and other highly leveraged (non bank) financial institutions which intensified concerns about the growing illiquidity in the banking system. While margin calls are not pleasant affairs and do impact all Market participants via declining asset prices, it is important to note that there are two major differences between illiquidity in non bank institutions and illiquidity in the banks: (1) the non banks don’t have FDIC to protect the value of their investors’ principal and they don’t have the Fed’s discount window and (2) illiquidity in the banking system means lack of credit to finance future economic growth; illiquidity in the non bank institutions means some investors are going to lose money (when they get margin calls) and some are going to buy bargains.

The point here is that (1) by far the more important problem is the banking system’s growing inability (or unwillingness) to extend credit and hence foster the continued growth of the economy and (2) it is an easily solvable one: via the discount window, the Fed simply buys (trades) the [illiquid] sub prime loans on the banks’ balance sheets for cash (US Treasury bills). That eliminates the issues of sub prime loan valuation and bank balance sheet liquidity--which would allow the bank to resume lending presumably using tighter credit standards than in pre-sub prime environment but at least they could resume lending. There is, of course, the risk that the Fed gets stuck with some worthless paper; but if history is any guide, the Fed will make money on this transaction.

The lesser problem is margin calls and bankruptcy among the highly leverage non bank institutions (Thornburg and Carlisle). Those guys made risky bets and now that credit risk has started to be re-priced [fixed income securities decline in price], they have no recourse to a margin call but puking out their investments irrespective of the quality of those investments. But that is a security price problem (i.e. assets being liquidated at distressed prices) not an economic liquidity problem (i.e. insufficient credit to finance economic growth) and it is a zero sum game, i.e. the puker is a loser (selling securities at distressed levels) and the pukee is a winner (buying securities at distressed levels).

Bottom line: the Fed can take steps to solve the current bank liquidity problems. It won’t solve the stupidity problems of institutional investors that bet large sums of money using vast amounts of leverage with virtually no protection to the downside. Nevertheless, the Fed has to act and soon or the non bank failures will likely precipitate bank failures with all the implications for future economic growth (headlines coming across the newswires are suggesting something along this line may be afoot).

.

Politics

Domestic

Obama’s potential plan for withdrawal from Iraq:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/03/019958.php

More on Obama and NAFTA:

http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-02-08/doing-a-job-on-nafta

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

A look at the current valuation of the S&P:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/sp-500-earnings.html

Technical

Yesterday was not so pleasant. What was most troubling was that the S&P closed below its January low close (circa 1310) and that set off all kinds of alarm bells among the technically oriented. As you know, I am not a technical purist (although I do believe that all those resistance/support levels and other esoteric presumptions about stock price behavior are grounded in the supply and demand for stock); so I am not quite so sensitive to an absolute single point price level. Hence, I would observe the following: (1) yes, the S&P closed below the January low close [1310]; however, it did not close below the January intra day low close [1269], (2) it also didn’t approach the 1982 to present up trend line which is now around the 1282 level, and (3) the DJIA didn’t get close to either its January low close (circa 11900) or its January intra day low close (circa 11600).

The point being that stocks are clearly testing the recent Market lows but there is by no means sufficient evidence to conclude that they are heading much lower. Certainly, today could be ugly; indeed, if it were so [down big with heavy volume; but holding above S&P 1269, DJIA 11600], I would interpret that positively, i.e. I believed that there would be a test of those January intraday lows, so bring it on and let’s get it over.

That said, I have no sense of the probabilities of whether or not stocks have begun another down leg. What I have is our Price Disciplines; and as of the close yesterday, only one stock in our three Portfolios violated its Stop Loss Price (see below). Further, in a screen against the five price markers I have been watching (the August 2007 intra day low, the August 2007 low close, the November 2007 intra day low close, the January 2008 intra day low close, the trend in place in August 2007 and the trend in place since the mid 2007 highs) most of the stocks in our Portfolios remain above at least two of those markers. So the evidence from the worm’s eye view of our Portfolios would suggest that stocks have not started another leg down.

Bottom line: I am assuming that stocks are testing the January lows. However, given the Market’s current volatility, this is a day to day judgment; so betting money on that assumption is a high risk/reward proposition. Today is likely to be tumultuous, so we will revisit the issue at day’s end.

All that said, these are the stocks about which I am concerned: in the Dividend Growth Portfolio: Bank of Nova Scotia. McGraw Hill, Brown Forman, Abbott Labs, and General Electric. In the Aggressive Growth Portfolio: Schwab, CME Group, UnitedHealth, Eaton Vance and Expeditors Int’l.

Fundamental

Subscriber Alert

American Eagle Outfitters (AEO-$18) reported disappointing sales and the stock got clocked, falling below its Stop Loss Price. Because of the increased volatility described above, the Aggressive Growth Portfolio will Sell one half of its position at the Market open today.

The stock price of Best Buy (BBY-$41) has fallen below the lower boundary of its Buy Value Range. Therefore, it is being Removed from the Aggressive Growth Buy List. Because the Aggressive Growth Portfolio doesn’t own this stock, no action is necessary.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BBY

The stock price of Sun Hydraulics (SNHY-$26) has risen above the upper boundary of its Buy Value Range. Accordingly, SNHY is being Removed from the Aggressive Growth Buy List. The Aggressive Growth Portfolio will continue to Hold this stock.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SNHY

The stock prices of McGraw Hill (MHP-$49) and General Electric (GE-$33) have fallen below the lower boundary of their respective Buy Value Ranges. Accordingly, MHP and GE are being Removed from the Dividend Growth Buy List. For the moment, the Dividend Growth Portfolio will continue to Hold these stocks.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MHP

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GE

The stock price of Martin Midstream Ptrs (MMLP-$35) has fallen below the lower boundary of its Buy Value Range. Therefore, it is being Removed from the High Yield Buy List. The High Yield Portfolio will continue to Hold this stock.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMLP

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Thursday, March 6, 2008

3/6/08

Economics

On the weak dollar:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120468065700512153.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

The productivity number yesterday looked decent:

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2008/03/us-productivity-rises-19-in-qiv-2007.html

Politics

W’s complete and utter failure to secure the border:

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/TonyBlankley/2008/03/05/border_insecurity

McCain on Social Security:

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2008/03/mccain_is_right_on_social_secu.php

Domestic

The sorry state of our government’s effort to secure this country’s borders:

http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=7fca007e-a0a7-774d-e1da-5b277d70960a

International War Against Radical Islam

The ACLU versus the Ma Bell:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YzQ1N2IwZDk2NDAyOTY5ZTE1MzhmNGZlNjQ0OTg2NTQ=

The Market

Technical

There are some optimists in our midst:

http://www.thestreet.com/p/_htmlrmd/rmoney/technicalanalysis/10406350.html

Fundamental

The rumored re-cap of Ambac announced yesterday was DOA--most of the ‘experts’ interviewed by the financial press had nothing but bad things to say about it; and yet stocks were up. Does this mean that all the bad news regarding the monoline insurers problems are now fully discounted? Given the constant stream of negative sentiment expressed in the media that prospect seems impossible. But it will be interesting to see how the Market reacts to the next piece of ill tidings from monolines.

Subscriber Alert

The stock prices of Genuine Parts (GPC-$41) and Abbott Labs (ABT-$53) have fallen below the lower boundary of their Buy Value Range. Accordingly, GPC and ABT are being Removed from the Dividend Growth Buy List. Since the Dividend Growth Portfolio never purchased GPC no action is required. IN the case of ABT, its stock price remains well above its Stop Loss Price; so for the time being the Dividend Growth Portfolio will continue to Hold this stock.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GPC

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ABT

The stock price of Ecolabs Inc. (ECL-$46) has fallen below the upper boundary of its Buy Value Range. Therefore, ECL is being Added to the Aggressive Growth Buy List. Since the Aggressive Growth Portfolio already owns this stock, no additional share will be bought.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ECL

The High Yield Buy List

Company Close 3/5 Buy Value Range

AJ Gallagher $23.76 $23-26

Martin Midstream Ptrs 34.69 32-37

Rayonier 43.05 39-45

Reynolds American 63.95 61-70

Pfizer 22.04 21-24

Company Highlight

Magellan Midstream Partners is a master limited partnership that is involved with the transportation, storage and distribution of refined petroleum products in the US. Since its founding in 2001, the partnership has grown earnings from $.95 a share to $2.24 in 2006 and dividends from $1.01 in 2001 to $2.34 in 2006. While these growth rates will slow, they nevertheless should continue because:

(1) Magellan portfolio of assets generates stable and recurring fee and tariff bases revenue,

(2) given MMP’s comfortable distribution coverage ratio and the prospects from its new assets,

(3) the history and reputation of its general partners [Madison Dearborn Partners & Carlyle/Riverstone] suggest an aggressive acquisition program,

(4) the attractive potential of MMP’s expansion projects.

The partnership is rated B+ by Value Line, has a debt/equity ratio of approximately 50% and yields 5.9%.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMP

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Quaker Chemical (High Yield Portfolio) raised its quarterly dividend per share from $.215 to $.24.

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

3/5/08

Economics

The Federal Budget dissected (this is a little long but not overwhelming; and it is a must read):

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm1829.cfm

The economics of drug development:

http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-02-08/protecting-patents-saving-lives

New data on who pays taxes:

http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html

Politics

Domestic

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.). John Boehner on Medicare:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTQxMGE0MDc1ZGQ3NWE0MzJmY2MxZGZmYzU4ZjA4YmM=

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

How the current correction stacks up (length and depth) historically:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/how-the-decline.html

Fundamental

One o’clock yesterday afternoon I thought that we were in the midst of the kind of emotional Market flush that would either help confirm the January 2008 low or demonstrate that it was just another minor support level on the way to lower lows (as you know my vote is with the former). Then of all things we got some good news (more clarity on solving Ambac’s capital problems) and stocks rallied. My gut tells me that the real test is yet to come; but it could be that yesterday was it. So I want to put some money to work (see Subscriber Alert below). This, of course, assumes that (a) any slowdown/recession is discounted in stock prices and (b) the Fed/government knows enough about the extent of the liquidity problem that it will take whatever actions are necessary to prevent a crisis [I know I’m a cockeyed optimist] and (c) therefore the January low is the bottom of this decline.

That said, I also think that this Market is not going to resume any meaningful up trend until (1) there is near perfect clarity to the current liquidity problem, (2) the Fed adjusts policy to deal with potential inflation, and (3) we know the outcome of the 2008 election. In other words, I am reiterating my opinion that stocks are likely in a trading range. So while I want to Buy stocks that have held up in this latest decline, I want to Sell the weak Holdings on any rallies. So my objective is to pull down the cash position in our Portfolios to around 15% in these dips (Buying the stocks that have performed well) and raise it to 20% on rallies (Selling those stocks that can’t move out of that zone between the lower boundary of their Buy Value Range and their Stop Loss Price).

Here’s a look at how tough this Market has been; note that our US Global Gold Shares are among the best performing funds:

http://www.thestreet.com/s/a-worse-bear-market-than-2001/funds/retirement-strategies/10406119.html?puc=_htmlbooyah

This is not a good sign for near term Market performance:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/high-yield-spre.html

Subscriber Alert

At the Market open this morning, the Canadian National Railway (CNI-$52 is being Added to the Dividend Growth Buy List and a one half position is being Bought by the Dividend Growth Portfolio. In addition, Praxair (PX -$79) is also being Added to the Dividend Growth Buy List. Since the Dividend Growth Portfolio already owns this stock, no additional shares will be purchased.

The High Yield Portfolio will Buy the second one half of a position in Pfizer (PFE-$22).

The Aggressive Buy List will Add Reliance Steel (RS-$57) and Franklin Resources (BEN-$94) and a one half position will be purchased in each by the Aggressive Growth Portfolio.

Both CNI and RS are stocks that had been previously bought then sold when they hit their Stop Loss Prices. Since then those stocks have recovered and now trade in their Buy Value Range. Getting Stopped Out of a stock in the midst of an emotional decline, then having to Buy it back at higher prices is one of the shortcomings of my Price Disciplines. However, I am ready to live with it because I can’t know in advance how far down a stock will trade so I developed our Sell Discipline’s with the primary purpose of avoiding large losses. I could of course ignore the stock afterwards to avoid the seemingly embarrassing predicament of having to Buy it back at higher prices; but in my opinion that would simply compound the shortcoming.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Sun Hydraulics (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported fourth quarter earnings per share of $.31 versus $.23 reported in the comparable 2006 quarter.

American Vanguard (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported fourth quaqrter earnings per share of $.28 versus $.20 recorded in the 2006 fourth quarter.

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

3/4/08

Economics

Manufacturing, productivity and NAFTA:

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2008/03/increases-in-productivity-have-caused.html

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

This is not very encouraging:

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/03/would-you-buy-t.html

A chart of the dollar:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/dollar-collapse.html

Fundamental

After the Market’s lousy performance last Friday, I was hoping for a big follow on sell off yesterday that would successfully test the January lows and more clearly establish that a bottom had been made. And it looked like that might happen when we got some disappointing economic data (January construction spending and the Institute for Supply Management’s February manufacturing index) near the opening Bell. But in the end, those unimpressive economic stats did little to move stock prices.

That is a bit disappointing because I do think that the January lows are going to be tested and I would just as soon get it over with. Until that happens, I will be concentrating on the poorer performing stocks in our Portfolio. The challenge will be to eliminate those that are trading below their Buy Value Range but above their Stop Loss Price and are unable to trade back into their Buy Value Range when stock prices rally--much like Quest Diagnostics, a position I recently eliminated in the Aggressive Growth Portfolio. I will continue providing lists of these stocks in The Morning Call.

Year end consensus Fair Value for the S&P:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/sp-500-price-ta.html

A look at international revenues as a percent of total revenues by S&P sector:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/03/earnings-here-v.html

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Bank of Nova Scotia (Dividend Growth Portfolio) reported fourth quarter earnings per share of $.82 versus $1.01 in the comparable 2006 quarter. Currency translation and turmoil in the financial markets were blamed for the shortfall.

Staples (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported fourth quarter earnings per share of $.47 versus $.46 recorded in the 2006 fourth quarter.

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Monday, March 3, 2008

3/3/08

Economics

A solution for stagflation (if you think that that is the problem):

http://blogs.forbes.com/digitalrules/2008/02/stagflations-su.html

A look at real disposable income:

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2008/02/25th-month-of-real-disposable-income.html

And how W’s tax cuts impacted both high and low income households:

http://krusekronicle.typepad.com/kruse_kronicle/2008/02/taxing-question.html

Politics

Domestic

Obama on free trade:

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/02/29/trade-wars-obama-vs--obama.html

McCain on pork:

http://americansforprosperity.org/index.php?page=blog

If you happened to see the 60 Minutes report on the Republican conspiracy to imprison the former Democratic governor of Alabama, and you care, here is an analysis of the testimony of the leading witness in 60 Minutes story. This is a bit long, has nothing to do the economy or the Market, but is another remarkable example of how untrustworthy the main stream media has become.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/03/019926.php

International War Against Radical Islam

This probably won’t be good for stocks:

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/a08a8dc4-a8ec-4564-8f20-4482b75f1e40

The Market

Technical

The Market performance after three down months in a row:

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/02/down-four-month.html

Fundamental

Aggressive Growth Buy List

Company Close 2/29 Buy Value Range

Accenture Ltd $35.25 $32-36

Amphenol 36.97 35-40

Best Buy 43.01 42-48

Fastenal Inc 40.66 36-41

Microsoft 27.19 26-30

SAP Inc 47.41 46-54

Sun Hydraulics 21.73 21-25

Subscriber Alert

The stock price of American Eagle Outfitters (AEO-$22) has fallen below the lower boundary of its Buy Value Range. Accordingly, it is being Removed from the Aggressive Growth Buy List. AEO’s price remains well above its Stop Loss Price; so for the moment, the Aggressive Growth Portfolio will continue to Hold this stock.

Company Highlight

Smith International produces drill bits; markets pipes, valves and fittings; supplies drilling-fluid systems, solids control and rig instrumentation equipment and waste management services; and provides equipment and services for well drilling, work over and completion. The company has grown profits at a 25% pace over the last 5 years, earning over a 20% return on equity utilizing little debt (14%). SII should continue its above average earnings performance as a result of:

(1) worldwide hydrocarbon demand along with rising prices continues spurring growth in exploration,

(2) SSI’s international exposure: non US exploration is growing at an even higher rate than domestic exploration,

(3) strong demand provides the company with pricing power allowing it to more than offset the increased cost of raw materials,

(4) the company maintains a very successful product development effort making it a leader in technological innovation,

(5) SSI also has an aggressive acquisition program which concentrates on proven products from niche industry players.

In addition, management is focused on returning capital to shareholders via the rapid growth of its dividend as well as an active share buyback program. SSI is rated B++ by Value Line, has a 29% debt to equity ratio and its stock yields about 1%.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SSI

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

United Technologies (Dividend Growth Portfolio) has proposed acquiring Diebold for $40 a share in cash.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UTX

More Cash in Investors’ Hands