Saturday, October 6, 2007

The Closing Bell

The Closing Bell

The Bottom line

10/06/2007

Statistical Summary

Current Economic Forecast

2007

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (revised): 2.0- 2.5%

Inflation: 2 - 2.5 %

Growth in Corporate Profits (revised): 6-8%

2008

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 3-3.25%

Inflation: 1.75-2%

Growth in Corporate Profits: 7-9%

Current Market Forecast

Dow Jones Industrial Average

2007

Current Trend:

Medium Term Uptrend 13030-14592

Long Term Uptrend 11757-23751

Year End Fair Value (revised): 13250

2008 Year End Fair Value (revised): 14250

Standard & Poor’s 500

2007

Current Trend:

Medium Term Uptrend (?) 1455-1585

Long Term Uptrend 1225-2400

Former Long Term Trading Range (?) 750-1527

Year End Fair Value (revised): 1525

2008 Year End Fair Value (revised): 1640

2008 Year End Fair Value: 1625

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio 9%

High Yield Portfolio 30%

Aggressive Growth Portfolio 5%

Economics

The economy is a positive for Your Money. The data continue to portray an economy that is slowing but not descending into recession:

(1) the housing stats were once again terrible: weekly mortgage applications fell 2.7% while the August pending previously owned home sales fell 6.5% versus expectations of a decline of 2.1%, Nothing good here; however, I remind you, as I occasionally do, that housing accounts for only about 5% of gross domestic product,

(2) the consumer continues to muddle through:

(a) the International Council of Shopping Centers reported weekly sales of major retailers unchanged but up 2.7% year over year. Redbook Research reported month to date retail chain store sales up .3% versus the similar period in August and up 2.0% versus the comparable 2006 period,

(b) September auto sales declined 3% but that was in line with expectations,

(c) weekly jobless claims rose 16,000 versus expectations of an increase of 14,000; however, September non farm payrolls [the key data point of this week] rose 110,000 in line with expectations but a huge comeback from the initially reported 4,000 decline in August [as an aside as it turns out, the August decline was a seasonal adjustment fluke related to the timing of teachers’ return to work and it was revised to up 89,000]; the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.7% versus 4.6% at the end of August but in line with expectations,

(3) the industrial sector results were mixed:

(a) the Institute for Supply Management [ISM] reported its September manufacturing index at 52.0 versus the August reading of 52.9; the ISM non manufacturing index came in at 54.8, in line with expectations and versus 55.8 recorded the prior month. Two points: [i] remember anything over 50.0 signifies growth and [ii] while the manufacturing index may be slightly disappointing, both indices connote slowing economic growth not recession,

(b) on the other hand, August factory orders fell 3.3% versus expectations of a 2.4% decline; ex transportation, orders dropped 1.7%. This number is not dissimilar to last week’s durable goods orders data, i.e. the weak August numbers followed very strong July statistics [+3.7%]. If the two are averaged, the trend is still up.

Bottom line: the ‘soft’ landing forecast is in tact. The most important takeaways this week are (1) the improvement in the credit market psychology as witnessed by major financial institutions ‘coming clean’ about the extent of their exposure to sub prime mortgages--which I covered in several of this week’s blogs, (2) the return of liquidity to as measured by the successful completion of several large private equity buyouts and the return of the industrial sector’s ability to finance its operating needs in the commercial paper market [see The Market, Fundamentals below] and (3) the very positive September payrolls number.

They are important because they suggest that the Fed’s expansion in the monetary base, the 50 basis point reduction in both the Fed Funds rate and the discount rate appear to have been successful in unfreezing the credit markets and thereby (hopefully) diminishing the risk of recession. Since this crisis stemmed not from poor economic numbers but rather the loss of liquidity in the financial markets, I believe that means that, assuming the economic data continues to reflect a ‘soft’ landing, no more Fed rate cuts are necessary [and as an aside, it means that my harsh criticism of Bernanke at the peak of the crisis was premature--he is to be complimented for Fed’s handling of the sub prime problem].

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDQxNWFiMTA2MjdmZmZhMjE0NDQ1ODQ0ZWRhZDQyMmU=

The Economic Risks:

(1) the economy is weaker than expected.

(2) Fed policy (reading the data correctly).

(3) a disruption in global oil supplies (It is not the price of oil but its availability that will cause severe economic dislocation.).

(4) protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.).

(5) fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.).

(6) a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.)

Politics

Both the domestic and international political environments are a negative for Your Money. Re-read the article in Thursday’s WSJ, linked in Friday’s blog, if you doubt.

The Market

Technical

The DJIA is in an up trend defined by the approximate boundaries of 13105 and 14676. The S&P has remained above the 1527 resistance level for enough time that I have to at least acknowledge the likelihood that it is now in an uptrend. If so, that trend is defined by the boundaries of 1455 and 1585. Based on the inability of this index to hold the 1527 on five prior occasions, I am cautious about assuming that it will this time.

Fundamental

The DJIA (14066) finished this week more than 5% over valued (13781) while the S&P (1557) is somewhat (about 3%) above Fair Value (1513).

A couple of points:

(1) I discussed one result of the Citigroup announced earnings write off in Tuesday’s blog: improved investor psychology as major financial players own up to the extent of their exposure to the sub prime problem. There is another result: because of Citigroup’s heavy weighting in the S&P index, its write off has the affect of reducing the third quarter year over year earnings growth expectation for the S&P by one half.

I have made the point in prior discussions that short term earnings short falls don’t have much impact on the SSI Valuation Model; however, other investors may be adjusting expectations which could suggest some downward pressure on the S&P valuation. Given that this index as well as the DJIA is somewhat overvalued in the SSI Valuation Model, lower prices would simply move these indices to Fair Value--in other words, don’t be surprised if equity prices give back some of their current advance.

(2) this week the commercial paper market was able to not only roll over all maturing issues but finance new paper. As you know, one of my biggest concerns through this liquidity problem had been the inability of businesses to finance their day to day operating needs. This week’s activity suggests that the industrial sector of the refinancing market is returning to normal--that is a huge positive.

Our investment strategy is:

(1) use our Price Disciplines to take advantage of the ongoing heightened volatility to upgrade the quality of our Portfolios by Selling our weakest holdings and to take profits in those stocks rising into their Sell Half Range when prices spike to the upside and buying the stocks of great companies when opportunities present themselves,

(2) insure that our Portfolios can ride out any further turmoil brought on by trouble in the credit markets

DJIA S&P

Current 2007 Year End Fair Value 13250 1525

Fair Value as of 10/31/07 13125 1513

Close this week 14066 1557

Over Valuation vs. 10/31 Close

5% overvalued 13781 1589

10% overvalued 14438 1664

Under Valuation vs. 10/31 Close

5% undervaluation 12469 1437

10%undervaluation 11812 1361

The Portfolios and Buy Lists are up to date.

Company Highlight:

Alliance Resource Partners L.P. produces steam coal, leases and operates a coal loading terminal on the Ohio River, resells coal directly and indirectly to utilities and provides mine products and services including the design and installation of underground mine hoists for transporting mine employees in and out of mines, design of systems for automating and controlling various aspects of industrial and mining environments and the design and sale of mine safety equipment. This partnership has earned a return on partners’ capital in excess of 100% over the last five years and has grown earnings and dividends at a 10%+ rate for the same time period. Environmental concerns notwithstanding, coal represents a major source of energy for the US and its sales should continue to grow at an attractive rate. The LP’s debt/equity ratio of 32% and its stock yields 5.1%.

EPS: 2006 $3.03, 2007 $3.75, 2008 $3.32; DVD: $1.92 YLD 5.1%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ARLP

Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 38 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder. Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns, managing a risk arbitrage hedge fund and an investment banking boutique specializing in funding second stage private companies. Through his involvement with Strategic Stock Investments, Steve hopes that his experience can help other investors build their wealth while avoiding tough lessons that he learned the hard way.

Friday, October 5, 2007

10/5/07

Economics

protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.). This new poll among conservatives was a featured article in the WSJ yesterday and is not good news. If you didn’t read it, you should:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119144942897748150.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.) Taxing the Internet:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071003/EDITORIAL/110030017/1013

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

This morning on the Market open, the Aggressive Growth Portfolio will buy a position in H2Diesel Holdings Inc, (HTWO-$7.25) a new 10 Bagger. I will follow this write up next week with a more detailed discussion of the company; however, management is now doing a road show, the stock is moving and I want to establish a position quickly.

H2 is commercializing a vegetable oil and animal fat based fuel alternative to diesel or distillate fuel oil. The important highlights to this story are:

(1) the company owns the rights to a proprietary, patent pending technology that converts vegetable oil and animal fats into a commercially viable alternative to diesel fuel,

(2) the company has built a bench test plant that has demonstrated that [a] this fuel can be produced at a cheaper cost than diesel or bio diesel and [b] it is a stable material that can be produced, shipped and stored without loss of effectiveness,

(3) the company has a source of supply of raw feed stock that will meet its most optimistic growth projections into the foreseeable future,

(4) the only permits required to build a production facility is a building permit,

(5) the company has demonstrated the commercial effectiveness of this fuel as a diesel substitute with a major US corporation,

(6) burning this fuel results is significantly less pollution than burning diesel or bio diesel,

(7) for a user to convert from using diesel/bio diesel to H2 requires nothing more than cleaning its storage tanks and feeder lines,

(8) the company is currently in talks with 40 potential customers [utilities]; 6-7 are in advanced stages,

(9) the footprint of the production facility is so small, that it can be located on site at most user’s facilities,

(10) the company is currently raising money to build its first 25 million gallon a year production facility which should yield $7 million operating profit annually,

(11) the company can add 25 million gallon per year modules to its initial facility up to a capacity of 100 million gallons per year,

(12) the first Market that the company is attempting to penetrate uses 600 million gallons of diesel per year.

I remind subscribers that this is a high risk investment. It is appropriate only for those who can afford to lose their entire investment. Any position should be one quarter to one third of a normal holding.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Thursday, October 4, 2007

10/4/07

Economics

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.) The endlessness of pork:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071002/NEWS01/710020331

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

News on the Street is that the Kohlberg, Kravis/Texas Capital buyout of TXU ($32 billion and the largest buyout deal to date) will be closed by the end of the month. This follows the successful completion of the First Data deal (no small transaction itself). The point being that huge transactions that couldn’t get financed 30 days ago are now closing and that is further evidence that liquidity is returning to the financial markets--which is a positive for stocks, in general, and financial stocks, in particular.

While I am not inclined to chase stocks at current price levels, SSI Portfolios own Citigroup (High Yield Portfolio), ASTA Funding (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) and US Bancorp (High Yield Portfolio) and they all remain on their respective Buy Lists.

EPS: 2006 $4.25, 2007 $4.55, 2008 $4.95; DVD: $2.16 YLD 4.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=C

EPS: 2006 $3.23, 2007 $3.57, 2008 $4.00; DVD: $.16 YLD .4%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ASFI

EPS: 2006 $2.61, 2007 $2.60, 2008 $2.80; DVD: $1.62 YLD 5.2%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=USB

A pro’s Market analysis:

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/48710-why-are-stocks-rallying

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

10/3/07

Economics

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.). More on earmarks:

http://www.examiner.com/a-964804~Long_road_ahead_on_earmark_reform.html

An opinion on why we won’t have a recession:

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2007/9/28/6-reasons-we-wont-get-a-recession.html?s_cid=rss:capital-commerce:6-reasons-we-wont-get-a-recession

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

An update on negotiations with North Korea:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010678

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Headline today’s Wall Street Journal ‘WalMart Era Wanes….’; the counterpoint:

http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/the-wall-street-journal-covers-death-of-wal-mart-wmt/

UGI (Dividend Growth Portfolio) management guided Street FY2008 earnings per share to $1.95-2.05 (SSI estimate-$1.95).

EPS: 2006 1.61, 2007 $1.78, 2008 $1.95; DVD: $.75 YLD 2.9%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UGI

Proctor & Gamble (Dividend Growth Portfolio) has retained Blackstone to evaluate the sale of several divisions (Duracell, Pringles, Folgers). Analysts estimate that the sale of all could bring $5 billion. The purpose of such a move would be to allow PG to focus on higher margin, faster growing divisions (beauty and healthcare).

EPS: 2006 $2.64, 2007 $3.02, 2008 $3.45; DVD: $1.41 YLD 2.3%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PG

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

10/2/07

Economics

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

The Citigroup (see below) announcement jump started the Market and stocks surged. Two points : (1) the S&P once again traded above its 2000 high [1527]. I am not going to get jiggy with this and declare it in an uptrend until it proves that it can hold that level. (2) the DJIA is now 7 ½% overvalued [by my calculations] and the S&P just barely so. I noted in last weekend’s The Closing Bell that stock prices were beginning to look a little pricey. There is more upside before they hit the red zone but my attention is now on the Sell Half Price Discipline.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

When I noted the Citigroup (High Yield Portfolio) earnings announcement yesterday morning, I mentioned that I thought that the bad news was in the stock but failed to give enough credence to my own initial analysis and ended being surprised by the impact of the news on the stock and on the Market. By that I mean that I had noted at the outset of the sub prime problem that, in my opinion, the fear (and as a result, the negative Market impact) being then generated by the uncertainty surrounding the magnitude and dispersion of potential losses from this problem would only be assuaged by (1) the major financial participants in this market ‘coming clean’ about their exposure to sub prime loans and the likely impact of that exposure on their balance sheets and income statements, and (2) the Fed providing the necessary liquidity to insure that the non sub prime credit transactions could be priced and cleared.

Citigroup’s write offs clearly addressed item (1) above. Investors reacted positively to not only C stock and financial stocks, in particular, but also to the Market in general--basically confirming that as the extent of the unknowns (the magnitude and dispersion of potential sub prime losses) become known, a lid on equity prices gets removed. The big question is, have enough major financial institutions disclosed their potential losses so that the true magnitude and dispersion of potential sub prime losses is sufficiently known that it not longer poses a Market risk. It would appear as though it has and our Portfolios reflect that to the extent that their financial holdings have increased; though I would caution against assuming it is a sure thing.

EPS: 2006 $4.25, 2007 $4.55, 2008 $4.95; DVD: $2.18, YLD 4.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=C

Walgreen (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported its first fiscal quarter earnings per share of $.40 versus expectations of $.47 and $.41 recorded in the comparable 2007 quarter. Investors really took the stock apart (down 15% on the day) as a consequence-- which brings up the question should we be taking any action? The Aggressive Growth Portfolio did not--WAG’s current Stop Loss Price is $36.50, so there is nothing in our Price Disciplines that would prompt it. (By the way, just a reminder, the Stop Loss Price is tied to a stock’s Buy Value Range not the last price high.)

Nevertheless, (1) the problems that the company cited in its press release as causes for the earnings shortfall should have been known and (2) the fact that management hadn’t alerted analysts that there was a problem will do nothing but engender tremendous ill will on the Street [analysts hate to look stupid]. The company said that it had identified the specifics of the causes and is taking action to solve the problem. Ordinarily, I tend to be forgiving when good quality companies that fit all our Quality Disciplines occasionally run into problems that can impact the stock price short term but not the company’s long term earnings/dividend paying potential. In this case, I am torn because management’s ignorance or lack of forthrightness may have done too much damage to the stock. The only reason the Aggressive Growth Portfolio didn’t Sell WAG yesterday is the company’s exceptional financial history. However, I will be doing more work on the company as well as monitoring the stock and may very well decide a Sale is the best course.

EPS: 2006 $1.72, 2007 $2.05, 2008 $2.40; DVD: $.31, YLD .8%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=WAG

A positive write up on FactSet Research (Aggressive Growth Portfolio):

http://www.zacks.com/rank/zcommentary/?id=6017

A neutral article on gold:

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={E46E3D74-3213-45C8-AB52-11CA37E56058}&siteid=nbs

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Nokia is buying Navteq for $8.1 billion in cash

From Cramer:

http://www.thestreet.com/_htmlbooyah/funds/tv-recap/10382184.html

TD Financial is acquiring Commerce Bank for $8.5 billion, 25% of which is in cash.

Monday, October 1, 2007

10/1/07

Economics

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

I did a weekend update on our 10 Bagger List:

Medivation continues to move forward in the Dimebon trials for both Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Disease. In the latter’s case, while I have no knowledge about the results, the current Phase I/II trial should be completed soon. In addition, the company should commence an MDV 3100 Phase I/IIa trial for prostate cancer in the near future.

I am hoping for another announcement of a new contract for ParkerVision; but nothing so far. In the meantime, ITT keeps getting contracts for its wireless systems and that means contracts for PRKR.

Raptor Network Technologies has also received some new albeit small orders. You will recall the Aggressive Growth Portfolio sold this stock during the August crunch in stock prices because the stock had hit its Stop Loss Price. The Aggressive Growth Portfolio will re-initiate this position on the Market open this morning.

Remember that these are very risky investments. Only those subscribers who can afford to lose their entire investment in these stocks should be buying them and then positions should be one third to one quarter the size of a normal position.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Graco (Dividend Growth Portfolio) is buying back an additional 7 million shares

Citigroup announced that it expected to take a multibillion dollar write off related to the sub prime mortgage problem in the third quarter. I think that this is already discounted in the stock price but will be watching it closely today.

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Bain Capital is buying 3Com for $2 billion in cash.