Saturday, June 23, 2007

June 23, 2007-The Closing Bell

The Bottom line

Statistical Summary

Current Economic Forecast

2007

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 2.5- 3%

Inflation: 2 - 2.5 %

Growth in Corporate Profits: 5-7%

2008

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 3-3.25%

Inflation: 1.75-2%

Growth in Corporate Profits: 7-9%

Current Market Forecast

Dow Jones Industrial Average

2007

Current Trend (revised):
Medium Term Uptrend 11797-14189

Long Term Uptrend 11485-19372

Year End Fair Value: 13000

2008 Year End Fair Value: 14000

Standard & Poor’s 500

2007

Current Trend (revised):

Medium Term Uptrend 1354-1594

Long Term Uptrend 1225-2400

Former Long Term Trading Range 750-1527

Year End Fair Value: 1500

2008 Year End Fair Value: 1625

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio 10%

High Yield Portfolio 40%

Aggressive Growth Portfolio 17%

Economics

The economy is a positive for Your Money. There was a dearth of data this week; and what there was, wasn’t so good.

(1) much of the bad news was in housing. May housing starts fell 2.1% and weekly mortgage applications dropped 3.4%. These are not promising numbers and clearly argue against the notion that we have put forth that the housing market is churning but not declining. The bulls [somewhat desperately] point out that [a] as disappointing as housing starts were, they came in better than expected {-3.1%} and [b] ignoring the contradiction, the decline was actually a positive because it means builders have lowered production in order to work off inventories. Forgetting these rather weak arguments, we are not going to alter our view after only a single week’s worth of data.

The only redeeming feature in this week’s construction data was that May building permits were up 3% versus expectations of an increase of .5%. While the permits for residential construction were weak [in line with the above numbers], nonresidential permits were strong--and that fits with our oft repeated thesis that strength in other sectors of the economy will mitigate the softness in housing.

(2) further, the weekly retail sales statistics didn’t have us feeling all warm and fuzzy. Weekly sales of major retailers reported by the International Council of Shopping Centers fell .1% and the month to date retail chain store sales reported by Redbook Research declined .8% though both organizations reported year over year increases of 1.9%.

(3) nor did the employment number as weekly jobless claims rose 10,000 versus expectations of an increase of 3,000.

(4) however, the business sector received a standout number though granted it was from a secondary indicator--the Philadelphia Fed reported its June manufacturing index at 18 versus expectations of 7. This is a very strong number and is more evidence of a recovery in the industrial activity.

(5) finally, in another of the few non-disappointing data points, the May index of leading indicators was up .3%, in line with expectations.

Bottom line, a bit of wind has been taken out of the sails of those (like us) that thought that the worse of housing and that the maximum degree of economic ‘softness’ was behind us. That is not to say that it is not; as we said above, one week’s data is not going to prompt us to change our forecast. However, the weak housing starts, employment and retail sales numbers do nothing to improve our conviction of a stronger economy in the second half of 2007.

The Economic Risks:

(1) the economy is weaker than expected.

(2) Fed policy (reading the data correctly).

(3) a disruption in global oil supplies (It is not the price of oil but its availability that will cause severe economic dislocation.).

(4) protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.).

(5) fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.).

(6) a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.)

Politics

Investors continue to view the political environment as a neutral to Your Money--or are they? This week witnessed non stop attempts by our elected representatives to wreak havoc on the economy, culminating on Friday with news that they were considering changing the taxation of the income of private equity firm’s general partners. The Markets didn’t like it (along with several other factors); so is the worsening political economics in the US starting to re-impose itself on investor consciousness?

It is too soon to say; but if you haven’t seen the polls lately, you should pay attention. Despite the miserable approval ratings for Congress, voters nonetheless say that they believe that Democrats can run the government better than Republicans. And if you haven’t seen the polls, have you taken a look at the Democrat’s near term legislative agenda? It will give you a quick read of their objectives (higher taxes, higher spending, more regulation, more protectionism). As always we make no judgments on the social value of the Democrat’s political agenda, but the economics of their policies in our opinion would be negative for capital formation and the growth of corporate earnings; and those are among primary determinants of the pricing of Your Money. Yes, W can and likely will veto those measures. But if the electorate truly prefers the levers of power in the hands of the Democrats, it is not long till they will have the opportunity to put them solidly in Democratic hands; and it is even less time before the consequences of that starts getting discounted in equity prices.

And can anyone say ‘Iran’? or Nigeria?

The Market

Technical

The DJIA is in an up trend currently defined by a channel with the approximate boundaries of 11797 and 14189. However, on Friday, it did fail to hold the 13400 support level--which we have been watching closely along with resistance at 13676 on the upside for near term indications of direction and momentum. The S&P remains unable to stay above 1527 (2000 high) which suggests to us that the two brief breaks above 1527 were anomalies and therefore leaves this index in its seven year trading range of 750-1527. If the DJIA can’t soon trade back above 13400 and if the S&P’s non-confirmation of the DJIA’s uptrend continues, we think that confirms that the moon shot is over and that any further progress on the upside is likely to be a struggle.

Our own internal technical indicator--the ratio of Buy rated stocks to the Sell Half rated stocks--has deteriorated further in the last two weeks. It is still not in the red zone but neither does it portend Market strength.

Fundamental

As the table below indicates, both the DJIA and the S&P are slightly overvalued as calculated by our Valuation Model. Given another week in which stocks could not regain upward price momentum, fundamentals seem to be reasserting themselves and that suggests either a period of side ways price action while the fundamentals catch up or a drift downward in price to Fair Value.

Our current investment strategy is to

(1) use the present heightened volatility to our advantage by taking profits when prices spike to the upside and buying the stocks of great companies when prices plummet,

(2) continue to focus on improving the quality of our Portfolios by Selling the stocks either of companies that fallen below the minimum standards of our Quality Discipline or that have performed poorly over an extended period.

DJIA S&P

Current 2007 Year End Fair Value 13000 1500

Fair Value as of 6/30/07 12750 1470

Close this week 13360 1503

Over Valuation vs. 6/30 Close

5% overvalued 13387 1544

10% overvalued 14025 1617

15% overvalued 14662 1690

20% overvalued 15300 1764


Friday, June 22, 2007

June 22, 2007

Economics

a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.) The Senate just failed to pass a bill removing a tariff on imported ethanol:

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/06/senate_votes_to_keep_ethanol_t.php

Unfortunately, there is more—this on the taxing the oil industry:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/06/criminalizing_supply_and_deman.html

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

A positive write up on Verizon (High Yield Portflio):

http://www.thestreet.com/_htmlatb/newsanalysis/techtelecom/10363782.html

An up beat look at Abbott Labs (Dividend Growth Portfolio):

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid={FB5B8046-43B3-4B17-9D76-801D53AD766F}&siteid=nbs&symb=

Cramer’s show last night was on the stocks in Warren Buffett’s Portfolio. Take a look at how many of them we own:

http://www.thestreet.com/_htmlbooyah/funds/madmoneywrap/10364144.html

Of course, knowing what Buffett owns is of little value without knowing the prices at which to Buy and Sell those stocks; so we thought that you would be interested in our Buy Range, Stop Loss and Sell Half prices for each stock that was in our Universes (red means we follow but don’t own the stock):

Buy Range Stop Loss Sell Half

Coke 37.90-41.65 , 32.20, 87.40

Proctor & Gamble 55.60-61.20 , 47.30, 82.90

Walmart 39.50-43.50, 33.50 , 70.25

Wells Fargo 28.10-30.90, 23.90, 41.90

Moody’s 49.30-54.30, 42.00, 72.75

JNJ 57.00-62.70, 53.10, 86.40

ConocoPhillips 59.10-65.00, 50.25, 86.00

US Bancorp 28.25-31.10, 25.80, 58.00

GE 31.00-34.10, 27.80, 56.60

United Healthcare 46.90-51.60 , 39.80, 108.25

Ingersoll Rand 35.50-39.00 , 30.20, 49.00

Market Analysis

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Equity Inns is being acquired by a Goldman Sachs affiliated group for $2.2 billion including debt assumption. Approximately $1 billion was for the equity.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

June 21, 2007

Economics

This is a really interesting paper by a Canadian scientist on global warming:

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/comment/story.html?id=597d0677-2a05-47b4-b34f-b84068db11f4&p=4

Loopholes in the current immigration legislation (from Senator Sessions):

http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=275456

Observations on inflation from the perma-bear:

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2007/06/agflation.html

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

The US economy is on the mend and so it follows that companies that are economically sensitive should do better as 2007 progresses. Yesterday, Federal Express voiced optimism concerning second half operations and Market responded positively. While we don’t follow Federal Express, United Parcel Service is on our Buy List. UPS is the world’s largest integrated air and ground package delivery service, operating in over 200 countries. Domestic parcel delivery volume is expected to increase this year. As important, international volume and pricing are improving in both Europe and Asia. Further gains are expected in Asia when the company brings a terminal in Shanghai on line which will allow the company to expand its intra-Asia business. The company recently completed major cost cutting measures in its supply chain management business which [a] will dramatically improve margins and [b] allow UPS to cross market it services. The company has grown its earnings and dividend in excess of a 15% pace since its founding; it has a 19-20% return on equity and a debt equity ratio of only 17%.

Of course, investor have to grit their teeth these days when investing in companies where fuel is an important cost factor which at least partially accounts for UPS stock’s lagging performance. Certainly, UPS has more flexibility than the airlines in adding surcharges as jet fuel costs rise (sustaining margins), though non-international shippers can elect to ship via cheaper ground transportation if those surcharges become punitive (losing revenue). Our bottom line is that the stock price reflects the worry about higher fuel prices but not an improving economy nor the possibility that oil prices might actually decline.

Our Buy Range for this stock $66-73 a share. Our Stop Loss is $58 and we would take profits at $89.

EPS: 2006 $3.86, 2007 $4.15, 2008 $4.50; DVD: $1.68, YLD 2.4%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UPS

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Medtronic (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) received FDA approval for a new pain treatment:

http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/2007/06/18/daily9.html?b=1182139200^1478896

A positive write up on Ecolab (Aggressive Growth Portfolio):

http://retail.seekingalpha.com/article/39053

\

And another on Quaker Chemical (High Yield Portfolio):

http://smallcap.seekingalpha.com/article/39045

And another on General Electric (Dividend Growth Portfolio):

http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/ge-is-a-buy-turnaround-in-place/

Market Analysis

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Nuveen agreed to be acquired by Madison Dearborn Partners for $5.75 billion in cash.

Luxottica is buying Oakley for $2.1 billion in cash.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

June 20, 2007

Economics

a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.) Comments on the Baucus-Grassley Bill:

http://www.redstate.com/stories/featured_stories/a_bad_bill_that_will_raise_taxes

Politics

Domestic

More on the immigration dance going in Congress from Mickey Kaus:

http://www.slate.com/id/2168675/

International War Against Radical Islam

Victor Hanson on the chaos and hypocrisy in the Middle East:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/06/civilization.html

A view of the world from a moderate Muslim:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070620/EDITORIAL01/106200002

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

We read an interesting article on the behavioral biases of individual traders by Terrance Odean, a professor of finance at the University of California in a CFA publication last weekend; we can’t find a link on the internet so we thought that a summary would be helpful and that it would probably behoove all of us to think about our own individual trading tendencies in light of this study.

We are not going to get into the mathematics of Professor Odean’s studies, but he performed extensive research [documented in the article] and concludes that individual traders (1) are overconfident, that is, they assume their information is more accurate and their investment ability more expert than they have reason to and as a result they trade more frequently than is in their best interest, (2) inadequately manage the emotions of investing and consequently, hold on to losers and sell winners, (3) focus on ‘attention-grabbing’ stocks which means that generally they are late arrivals to an investment trend and (4) they chase trends. Professor Odean estimates that these shortcomings lower the average individual investor’s annual return by 2%.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Market Analysis

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Family Dollar Stores is buying back 5 million shares (about $170 million).

Home Depot is buying back $22.5 billion in stock.

Expedia is buying back $3.5 billion in stock.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

June 19, 2007

Economics

a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.) The rising tax burden incorporated in the current legislative agenda:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OGRmOTJjOTk2NmYwZDAwYWUzM2MxNDY3ZjYwNmZmM2I=

Here is a map showing the areas where homes are the most (least) overvalued:

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2007/06/most_overunder_.html

Politics

Domestic

The Employee Free Choice Act (the non-secret ballot for unionization) from John Fund:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/

The latest on immigration from Micky Kaus :

http://www.slate.com/id/2168675/

On the value of fences from Charles Krauthammer:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/14/AR2007061401742.html

International War Against Radical Islam

In case you missed this; suicide bombers on their way to the US:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/06/exclusive_suici.html

The Market

Fundamental

As you know, we love to use high yield stocks as bond substitutes in about 25% of our Fixed Income Portfolio. That strategy isn’t appropriate for all investors because it entails assuming additional risk. But for those who can do so, there is little penalty to current income and it offers the opportunity to achieve higher returns. Part of that extra risk is in the form of longer duration (bond maven lingo) which means to ordinary guys like us, increased price volatility when interests move. Right now many investors are worried about long term interest rates rising so the risk in owning a high yield stock is that if rates do increase, a high yield stock may decline more than a long term bond. We don’t happen to be as pessimistic about a move up in interest rates; so we view properly priced high yield stocks as attractive. In addition, if we stick to buying the stocks of companies that are raising their dividends every year, we think some of the ‘duration’ risk can be mitigated.

One company on our Buy List whose stock yields almost as much as a 30 Treasury and which has raised its dividend every year since 2001 is Southern Company (SO). This utility supplies electricity to customers in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and Mississippi. The company has grown its earnings and dividends between 2-3% over the last 10 years; but we expect that growth rate to increase due to favorable economic trends in their customer area as well as the company’s excellent record of system reliability and service cost. SO earns between 14-15% return on shareholders equity. The company has strong financials and carries an A rating on Financial Strength from Value Line. Its stock yields 4.6%.

Our Buy Range on SO stock is $35.25-38.75 a share. Our Stop Loss is at $32.25 and we would take profits at $43.25.

EPS: 2006 $2.10, 2007 $2.25, 2008 $2.30; DVD: $1.60, YLD 4.6%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SO

Monday, June 18, 2007

Building a Position in Gold

We have been gradually building a position in US Global Investor Fund Gold Shares (USERX) as a hedge position against (1) potential turmoil resulting from terrorist activity/disruptions in global oil supplies and (2) the likelihood of a more liberal element gaining control of the US political agenda post-November 2008 [our usual disclaimer: we are making no judgment as to the social value of a more liberal agenda; we are saying that higher taxes, higher spending, more regulation of industry and a more protectionist trade policy is not positive for the economy]. We recognize that neither of these risks to the US economy are at the forefront of investors minds--they are way too obsessed with a strong global economy pushing up interest rates and inflation right now.

Our concerns aside, gold and gold related investments have done little in over a year. In the meantime, nothing has occurred that would suggest a lower probability of either risk mentioned above. Indeed in the last month, two domestic terrorist plots have been foiled; Iran has become ever more defiant of the terms of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty of which they are a signatory and more blatant in their involvement in the Afghanistan/Iraq conflicts; Hamas appears to have triumphed in Gaza, making it now a terrorist state; the proposed FY2008 budget has huge spending increases not to mention 30,000+ earmarks; as this is being written, a debate is going on to as to how to penalize oil companies as some sort of poor corporate citizen despite that the fact those doing the debating refuse to provide for procedures that would allow for the approval of new refining capacity or for permission to drill in areas where not only is there strong reason to believe that huge oil deposits exist but where the Chinese/Cubans are already drilling and …...well, you get the picture.

In any case, we are adding to our position in USERX this morning in the Aggressive Growth Portfolio.