Saturday, October 13, 2007

The Closing Bell

The Closing Bell

The Bottom line

10/13/07

Statistical Summary

Current Economic Forecast

2007

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (revised): 2.0- 2.5%

Inflation: 2 - 2.5 %

Growth in Corporate Profits (revised): 6-8%

2008

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 3-3.25%

Inflation: 1.75-2%

Growth in Corporate Profits: 7-9%

Current Market Forecast

Dow Jones Industrial Average

2007

Current Trend:

Medium Term Uptrend 13133-14719

Long Term Uptrend 11757-23751

Year End Fair Value (revised): 13250

2008 Year End Fair Value (revised): 14250

Standard & Poor’s 500

2007

Current Trend:

Medium Term Uptrend (?) 1455-1585

Long Term Uptrend 1225-2400

Former Long Term Trading Range (?) 750-1527

Year End Fair Value (revised): 1525

2008 Year End Fair Value (revised): 1640

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio 9%

High Yield Portfolio 30%

Aggressive Growth Portfolio 8%

Economics

The economy is a positive for Your Money. There was a dearth of much clarifying economic data this week: there was little on housing, the consumer statistics were so confusing as to be worthless, though employment remains strong which is good, industrial numbers were mildly disappointing but the trade and budget deficits showed improvement and inflation is under control. Bottom line, I believe that the data continues to support the ‘soft’ landing, moderating inflation scenario.

(1) housing: the only data point was weekly mortgage applications which were up 2.4% after having fallen for the prior two weeks. This is a secondary indicator; so I take little comfort from this first bit of good housing news in some time.

(2) data on the consumer was mixed and a bit confusing:

(a) the International Council of Shopping Centers reported that the weekly sales of major retailers were unchanged--for the second week in a row; while year over year, they were up 2.1%. Redbook Research reported that month to date retail chain store sales rose .3% versus the comparable time frame in September and 2.0% versus the similar period in 2006,

(b) September same store retail sales were reported up 1% by Lazard Capital Markets--a disappointing number; however, the Commerce Department reported September retail sales [a broader measure than the Lazard number] rose .6% versus expectations of an increase of .4%; ex autos, sales were up .2% versus estimates of up .4%. Most important, the year over year increase in sales was 5%; ex autos and gasoline, it was up 4.6%,

(c) perhaps contributing to the confusion over retail sales numbers over the last year is another Commerce Department report that apparel prices have fallen 3% over the last 12 months; if accurate, that suggests retail unit sales have been quite strong.

(d) weekly jobless claims fell 12,000 versus expectations that they would remain unchanged; this is a strong bounce back after last week’s slightly disappointing number--employment is strong.

(e) finally, the initial October University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment came in at 82.0 versus estimates of 84.2 and the final September reading of 83.4--a discouraging sign for future consumer spending.

(3) industry:

(a) August wholesale inventories rose .1% versus expectations of an increase of .3%; importantly, wholesale sales were up .4%. The wholesale inventory to sales ratio was unchanged versus July but down versus August 2006.

(b) August business inventories grew .1% versus expectations of a rise of .3%; unfortunately, business sales fell .4% following July’s strong 1.1% increase: another data point in the strong--July--weak--August--net--positive--two--month--growth pattern seen earlier in the durable goods orders and factory orders.

Both inventory numbers reflect tight financial management--a positive.

(4) macro economic trends:

(a) the September trade deficit shrank more than expected to $57.8 billion as a result of surging exports; remember that an improving trade balance has the effect of adding to the gross domestic product number.

(b) the US government’s 2007 fiscal year deficit fell to $163 billion versus $248 billion in FY2006--clearly an improvement; more important, government spending as a percent of gross domestic product [the true indication of government intrusiveness and fiscal irresponsibility] fell for the first time since W took office. Regrettably, the outlook for a continuation of this trend is not positive.

(c) September producer price index [PPI] rose 1.1% versus expectations of an increase of .5%, propelled primarily by a 4.1% jump in oil prices; however, the core PPI was up .1% versus estimates of up .2%. Year over year the core PPI came in at 2%--the top end of the Fed’s comfort range. Inflation remains under control.

The Economic Risks:

(1) the economy is weaker than expected.

(2) Fed policy (reading the data correctly).

(3) a disruption in global oil supplies (It is not the price of oil but its availability that will cause severe economic dislocation.).

(4) protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.).

(5) fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.).

(6) a rising tax and regulatory burden (Government has never proven that it could solve economic problems efficiently or satisfactorily.)

Politics

Both the domestic and international political environments are negatives for Your Money. When I read (1) every statement from the primary Democratic Presidential candidates which generally contain a proposal for a new entitlement program, (2) the polls pointing to a likely Democratic Presidential victory as well as an increase in their majorities in both Houses, and (3) the polls showing Republican voters are opposed to free trade, my concern about higher secular inflation and shrinking corporate profit margins--neither of which are good for Your Money--increases.

On the other hand, the near silence from the main stream media and the Democratic Presidential candidates on Iraq and the war on Islamofacism is a positive (knock on wood).

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2007/10/018733.php

The Market

Technical

The DJIA is in an up trend defined by the approximate boundaries of 13133 and 14719. The S&P remains above the 1527 resistance level and is in an up trend defined by the boundaries of 1455 and 1585.

Fundamental

The DJIA (14083) finished this week more than 5% over valued (13781) while the S&P (1561) is somewhat (about 3%) above Fair Value (1513).

I have stated several times that the recent Fed easing was in response to the liquidity freeze up in the credit markets not a too weak economy; and, therefore, in anticipating the Fed’s action at its October meeting, those conditions that will prompt a further Fed easing are (1) the inability of the credit markets to clear non sub prime transactions and/or (2) a marked weakening in economic activity. Since it appears that the credit markets are functioning once again and the economy continues to grow albeit at a slower rate, I think that the odds of a Fed easing are fairly low.

I make this point because while the bond market is not pricing in a further Fed easing in October, far too many of the stock gurus think it likely. If the bond market is right, that could lead to disappointment among equity investors. Coupled with the current over valued level (at least as calculated by the SSI Valuation Model) of the Market indices, my inclination is towards caution, the value of cash, in my opinion, rises and explains why our Portfolios have not been aggressively Buying stocks when they drop into their Buy Value Ranges.

Our investment strategy is:

(1) use our Price Disciplines to take advantage of the ongoing heightened volatility to upgrade the quality of our Portfolios by Selling our weakest holdings and to take profits in those stocks rising into their Sell Half Range when prices spike to the upside and buying the stocks of great companies when opportunities present themselves [and the Markets dip],

(2) insure that our Portfolios can ride out any further turmoil brought on by trouble in the credit markets

DJIA S&P

Current 2007 Year End Fair Value 13250 1525

Fair Value as of 10/31/07 13125 1513

Close this week 14083 1561

Over Valuation vs. 10/31 Close

5% overvalued 13781 1589

10% overvalued 14438 1664

Under Valuation vs. 10/31 Close

5% undervaluation 12469 1437

10%undervaluation 11812 1361

The Portfolios and Buy Lists are up to date.

Company Highlight:

Citigroup is a diversified financial services firm with operations in consumer and corporate banking (Citibank), insurance (Travelers), investment banking and asset management (Smith Barney). The company recently took a large earnings write off tied to the sub prime mortgage market. With this problem hopefully behind C, there are numerous positives that should drive profits to higher levels including strong international banking and investment banking returns as well as a recently implemented expense control program. The company has consistently earned a 17%+ return on equity and grown profits and dividends at an 8-10% annual pace. Its stock yields 4.7%.

EPS: 2006 $4.25, 2007 $4.30, 2008 $4.95; DVD: $2.10 YLD 4.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=C

Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 38 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder. Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns, managing a risk arbitrage hedge fund and an investment banking boutique specializing in funding second stage private companies. Through his involvement with Strategic Stock Investments, Steve hopes that his experience can help other investors build their wealth while avoiding tough lessons that he learned the hard way.

Friday, October 12, 2007

10/12/07

Economics

protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.). The real impact of the free trade agreements with Peru, Panama, Columbia and South Korea (must read):

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=101007B

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.)

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/10/here_little_piggy.php

And:

http://www.examiner.com/a-983098%7EStop_their_pay__send_them_home.html

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Technical comments on gold, 3M (Dividend Growth Portfolio), General Dynamics (Dividend Growth Portfolio) and Alcon (Aggressive Growth Portfolio).

http://www.thestreet.com/p/_htmlrmm/rmoney/technicalanalysis/10383933.html

Fundamental

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Fastenal (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported third quarter earnings per share of $.41 versus expectations of $.42 and $.36 reported in the comparable 2006 quarter.

EPS: 2006 $1.32, 2007 $1.55, 2008 $1.85; DVD: $.44 YLD 1.0%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FAST

Infosys Technologies (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) reported third quarter earnings per share of $.48 versus expectations of $.46 and $.35 recorded the third 2006 quarter. Despite beating estimates, the stock traded down on concerns over the potential weakening of US demand and currency translation issues. Management has already been dealing with these issue by cutting costs, raising prices and increasing their marketing effort worldwide. Further, they lifted their 2007 full year earnings forecast by 2% which had already been anticipated to grow 28%.

EPS: 2006 $1.50, 2007 $1.97, 2008 $2.35; DVD: $.55 YLD 1.1%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=INFY

Positive comments on Oshkosh Truck (Aggressive Growth Portfolio):

http://www.zacks.com/rank/zcommentary/?id=6093

A negative write up on Altria (Dividend Growth Portfolio):

http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index_pdf.php?id=6104

General Electric (Dividend Growth Portfolio) reported third quarter earnings per share of $.54 versus expectations of $.50 and $.47 reported in the comparable 2006 quarter. GE also stated that it would buy back $5.7 billion in stock in the fourth quarter.

EPS: 2006 $1.99, 2007 $2.25, 2008 $2.50; DVD: $1.15 YLD 2.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GE

Johnson and Johnson (Dividend Growth Portfolio) is voluntarily withdrawing cough and cold remedies for children under the age of two based on an FDA recommendation. The impact should negligible.

EPS: 2006 $3.78, 2007 $4.10, 2008 $4.45; DVD: $1.62 YLD 2.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=JNJ

Citigroup (High Yield Portfolio) announced a corporate restructuring which is not likely to make some investors happy--they want the CEO gone and he is not. The High Yield Portfolio owns this stock as a bond substitute (i.e. its attractive yield); so our bet is (1) a safe dividend that provides a high yield and (2) a chance of capital appreciation. Those who bought the stock betting on the CEO’s replacement were betting on a short term spike in the stock were it to happen. They will likely be disappointed and sell C.

EPS: 2006 $4.25, 2007 $4.55 2008 $4.95; DVD: $2.16 YLD 4.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=C

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Avon Products is buying back $2 billion in stock.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

10/11/07

Economics

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

A positive write up on Medivation (10 Bagger):

http://www.thestreet.com/_htmlbooyah/newsanalysis/biotech/10383640.html

C.R. Bard (Dividend Growth Portfolio) is buying back $500 million in stock.

EPS: 2006 $3.29, 2007 $3.75, 2008 $4.25; DVD: $.58 YLD 0.7%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BCR

Forward Air (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) is revising third quarter earnings per share guidance from $.42 to $.35-.37.

EPS: 2006 $1.55, 2007 $1.55, 2008 $1.85; DVD: $.28 YLD 0.8%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FWRD

A FDA panel recommended that the agency approve a Medtronic (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) drug coated stent. If MDT receives final approval, it will be marketing positive against its rivals (Johnson & Johnson--Dividend Growth Portfolio--and Boston Scientific) in this market.

EPS: 2006 $2.41, 2007 $2.70, 2008 $3.05; DVD: $.47 YLD 0.9%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MDT

Peabody Energy (Aggressive Growth Portfolio) is spinning off Patriot Coal, a company with coal assets in West Virginia and Kentucky. Peabody shareholders will receive one share of Patriot for every 10 shares they hold. The record date for the distribution in October 22, 2007.

EPS: 2006 $2.23, 2007 $1.90, 2008 $3.10; DVD: $.24 YLD 0.6%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BTU

Hershey (Dividend Growth Portfolio) is reported to be in talks with Cadbury regarding the acquisition of one by the other although it is not clear who would be buying whom. The last year has witnessed a slowdown in revenue growth and the Board (Hershey Trust) needs to take action to re-invigorate sales growth.

EPS: 2006 $2.34, 2007 $2.25, 2008 $2.45; DVD: $1.15 YLD 2.3%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=HSY

WalMart (Dividend Growth Portfolio) reported September sales grew 1.4% but more importantly raised its third quarter earnings estimate 6%.

EPS: 2006 $2.92, 2007 $3.17, 2008 $3.50; DVD: $.83 YLD 2.0%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=WMT

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

H2 Diesel Report

H2Diesel Holdings Inc

THE COMPANY

H2Diesel (OTC BB: HTWO) is a development stage company that holds an exclusive perpetual license for North America, Central America and the Caribbean to a proprietary patent pending technology for the manufacture of a biofuel produced from vegetable oil and animal fats that can be utilized anywhere diesel or other distillate fuel oil are used today. The company’s license also includes the right of first offer for any other country or territory except Italy and Paraguay.

THE PRODUCT

H2Diesel’s biofuel is a blend of feedstock (vegetable oil/animal fats), proprietary additives and water under atmospheric conditions at room temperature. Its unique properties include:

1. it can be made from a wide variety vegetable oils (soybean, canola, palm, sunflower, cotton seed, jatroba, restaurant waste) and animal fats; importantly, there are no petroleum based products in this fuel.

2. its ‘cloud point’ (temperature at which it begins to gel) is below minus 15 degrees Fahrenheit versus 32 degrees Fahrenheit for conventional biodiesel.

3. it is very stable and therefore can be easily stored or shipped with no product instability.

4. it can be run in conventional diesel engines without the need for modification save the cleaning of storage tanks and fuel lines; further it can be customized per customer applications.

5. it possesses lubricating qualities that lessen engine wear versus petroleum based fuels

6. when burned it produces 80% less carbon dioxide and almost 100% less sulfur dioxide than conventional diesel fuel.

7. the company has completed a successful technical and environmental test burn with Dynergy, Inc., a major US utility, to validate its properties in a commercial facility and is awaiting the environmental impact study.

THE PRODUCTION PROCESS

Because production is essentially an emulsification process:

1. there are no significant by products. That means that there nothing to dispose of and there are no environmental permits required to build the production facility. Only a building permit is needed.

2. the production facility is relatively small (6000 square feet for a 25 million gallon a year production unit) and inexpensive to build.

3. labor costs are very moderate: again for a 25 million gallon a year production unit, it takes a total of 8 people to operate 3 shifts/5 days a week.

4. in fact the production process is so simple, the company expects certain customers to license the process from H2 and pay toll on the gallonage it produces.

5. when Federal tax credits are factored into its production costs, it can be produced at a competitive price to conventional diesel and cheaper than biodiesel fuel.

6. the company has established a relationship with Twin Rivers Technologies, an oleochemical manufacturer that is a spin off from Proctor and Gamble. Twin Rivers is a potential source of supply for vegetable oil feedstock. In addition, Twin Rivers jointly developed with H2 a 3 million gallon production test facility on one of its properties; that test was successful. Further, H2 has entered into an agreement with Twin Rivers to build a 25 million gallon a year production facility on a second Twin Rivers facility.

THE MARKET

As a replacement for diesel fuels, the US market is approximately 65 billion gallons a year.

The initial US market segment (600 million gallons a year) that H2 has targeted is the peaking utility power plant industry (facilities that are utilized by utilities only during times of peak power usage). The power plants in this market segment are typically (1) small, (2) gas turbine powered, (3) liquid fueled, (4) old, i.e. inefficient, generate high emission rates and therefore are saddled with environmental issues, (4) marginally profitable, but (5) are nonetheless critical to ‘keeping the lights on’ during periods of peak demands.

The advantage that H2 brings to this market; (1) a lower cost fuel, (2) makes plants’ output eligible for ‘Renewable Energy Credits’, a premium priced product, (3) will generate carbon credits [when and if applicable], (4) reduce environmental pressure, and (5) improve local neighbor relations.

Following the successful penetration of the above market, H2 intends to focus on the cruise ship industry (2 billion gallons a year) and the heating (oil) industry (4.4 billion gallons a year).

Helping to drive the future usage of biofuels are:

(1) the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005, which establishes minimum nationwide requirements for the production of renewable fuels,

(2) the Federal 2005 Renewal Fuel Standards which requires national production of renewable fuels to exceed 7.5 billion gallons by 2012,

(3) mandates and incentives from more than 30 states for the use of biofuels,

(4) 24 states have established Renewal Portfolio Standards requiring the use of renewable sources to generate electricity.

H2 has entered into an agreement with eBarton, a renewable energy finance company, to assist it to market its product to utilities and independent power producers in the US. According to the company, eBarton has extensive energy industry experience and contacts in the upper echelons of the power generation industry.

FINANCIAL

The company is basically a start up and is not expected to generate revenue until late 2008 and will not likely reach cash flow breakeven until 2009. It is in the process of raising $30 million to (1) clean up its capital structure, (2) finance the construction of the 25 million gallon production facility mentioned above, and (3) provide working capital to sustain the company until it is cash flow sufficient.

Ordinarily, for a start up company to go public through a reverse merger (which H2 did) is, in my opinion, more of a detriment than a positive to its development. However, the scientist that developed the biofuel which the founders licensed insisted that he would only deal with a public company. Hence, the H2 founders had no choice but to go this route.

RISKS

1. H2 is a start up company and hence has a limited operating history, no revenue and no earnings.

2. If H2 fails to meet its financial obligations to the inventor of the biofuel, its license can be terminated.

3. If H2 is unable to secure the financing required to build a production facility, it has nothing to sell.

4. H2’s feed stock and final product are both subject to volatility in commodity prices that could impact its ability to price its product competitively.

5. H2 common stock is illiquid which could cause investors difficulty in both buying and selling shares.

6. Environmental laws are subject to political issues; any change from the current status could be detrimental to H2 biofuel’s ability to meet any new standards.

MY STANDARD ADMONITION

This investment is highly speculative. It is appropriate for only those investors that can afford to lose their entire investment. Even then, investors should buy a position that is substantially less than that which is normally appropriate.

10/10/07

Economics

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

Equities rallied yesterday following the release of the minutes of the Fed’s September 18th meeting. I am not going to parse the words but the bottom line is that investors were encouraged by the unanimity of FOMC Board’s vote to ease money supply--thereby suggesting that should credit markets conditions continue to hamper normal business financing transactions, the Fed would take additional steps to insure liquidity problems don’t push the economy into recessions. Two points:

(1) I am encouraged by this and believe it to be a positive for the economy; however, I think it important to point out that the above quoted unanimity of concern was about a liquidity issue not a macro-economic one; in other words, I am again cautioning that further monetary easing [another drop in the Fed Funds rate] is likely only if credit markets are unable to clear normal business transactions but not because the economic data being reported is a bit erratic.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aq4TUMZuFDgw&refer=home

(2) The DJIA [14164] is approaching a 7% overvalued level though the S&P continues to lag. My focus is on stocks near their Sell Half Price or stocks that simply can’t rally in a strong Market.

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

Thoughts on the valuation of oil stocks:

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/49455-exxon-mobil-stock-up-big-but-underperforming-crude

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

10/9/07

Economics

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

I wanted to point out another quality financial institution whose stock performance has lagged the Market.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) is a bank holding company with 2,400 offices and 4,000 ATMs in 24 states with approximately 32% of its loans to commercial enterprises, 21% to commercial real estate and 47% to individuals. The bank has a return on equity of over 20% and has grown earnings per share and dividends at a 12%+ pace over the last 10 years. USB should be able to maintain this admirable record as it grows its more stable fee oriented income, focuses on tight control over expenses and continues a significant share buy back program. This company would qualify for the Dividend Growth Portfolio were it not for its relatively high debt to equity ratio (62%). Its stock yields 5.2%.

EPS: 2006 $2.61, 2007 $2.60, 2008 $2.80; DVD: $1.62, YLD 5.2%

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=USB

Here is a generally positive write up on Abbott Labs another stock on the Dividend Growth Buy list.

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/49291-abbott-laboratories-in-vitro-sale-may-prove-difficult

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

More Cash in Investors’ Hands

Textron is acquiring United Industrial for $800 million in cash.

Monday, October 8, 2007

10/8/07

Economics

fiscal profligacy (Government spending as a percent of GDP is too high and the looming explosion in entitlement expenditures will make it worse. There is no good solution save spending discipline.)

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PaulWeyrich/2007/10/04/earmarks_and_congressional_corruption

protectionism (Free trade is a major positive for world and US economic growth.)

http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/10052007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/free_trade_follies.htm

Politics

Domestic

International War Against Radical Islam

The Market

Technical

Fundamental

I focused most of my attention last week on Citigroup as the poster child for financial institutions that has ‘come clean’ on their exposure to the sub prime problem; but Merrill Lynch deserved as much attention. And like Citigroup, its stock price has lagged the recovery of others in its industry. MER is on the Dividend Growth Buy List.

Merrill Lynch is a leading financial services firm providing underwriting, investment advisory, securities brokerage and trading and investment management. The company has grown profits and dividends 18-20% over the last five years, earning a return on equity in the 14-15% range. Recent results have benefited from increasing stock prices, rising IPO’s and healthy merger/acquisition activity. While the credit problems may curtail some parts of MER’s business, the likelihood of a ‘soft’ economic landing in the US, the global economic strength and the current reasonable valuation of US equities should insure that any shortfall will be modest and short lived; and the recent decline in Merrill’s stock more than reflects any near term slow down in earnings growth. Furthermore, the company’s $6 billion stock back program provides evidence of management’s confidence in the future growth.
EPS: 2006 $6.64, 2007 $8.75, 2008 $8.70; DVD: $1.40 YLD 1.9%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MER

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

More Cash in Investors’ Hands